Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Apr 26, 2016 - 03:53 PM

2014 ACS Migration PUMA: San Francisco Codes Confusion

I am looking into migration to and from San Francisco using the 5-Year 2014 ACS Migration PUMAs. Working with the data, I have come to realize that the migration PUMA for San Francisco is both 7500 and 2200. I believe this is true because 2200 was the super puma for the 2000 Census: https://usa.ipums.org/usa/volii/PUMA_... and 7500 was the super puma for the 2010 Census http://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/refer...


But I could not find documentation that states this clearly. I want to be absolutely sure I am doing the right thing. Thank you.

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Erin_Meyer

Staff

You are correct in your conclusions. In multi-year ACS files, PUMA boundaries depend on the year the respondent was interviewed. In the case of the 2014 5-Year file, respondents interviewed in years 2010 and 2011 will follow the Census 2000-based PUMAS, while respondents interviewed in years 2012-2014 will follow the Census 2010-based PUMAs. This page describes the relationship in more depth and also provides a map that displays how the boundaries for Migration PUMAs changed between 2000 and 2010.

Hope this helps.

 

Apr 27, 2016 - 03:14 PM

1
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

How Do I Link Husbands & Wives in 1974 & 2008 Liberian IPUMS Samples to Study...
I am looking for the Kessler 6 variable in IPUMS-MEPS
Reason for missing MIGSTA1 values in ASEC files for 1985 (and 1995)
India Area-level data (geo2) inconsistent for total population, urban share, ...
Does anyone have a method for handling missing data in CPS "EDUC" variable? 2...
How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |