Question

Status:Closed    Asked:May 29, 2015 - 02:20 PM

ACS METAREA data missing for Burlington, VT for all years, and METRO is all rural or unidentifiable. Reason?

But according to the 2010 Census, VT is 38.9% urban. What's going on with the VT geography data?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Tim_Moreland

Staff

For the 2005-onward ACS samples, the PUMA is the smallest identifiable geography. Each PUMA represents an area of at least 100,000 persons. The largest city in Vermont (Burlington) has fewer than 50,000 persons; therefore, none of the cities in Vermont are large enough to be identified. As a result, all Vermont respondents' METRO variable is either rural (lives in a PUMA that does not contain a city) or unidentifiable (lives in a PUMA that contains both city and non-city area).


Here is the PUMA map for Vermont, which is divided into four PUMAs that are each comprised of three or more counties.


Hope this helps.

 

Jun 01, 2015 - 10:27 AM

0
0
Report it

Answers

That does, thanks!

 

Jun 01, 2015 - 10:29 AM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

I am looking for the Kessler 6 variable in IPUMS-MEPS
Reason for missing MIGSTA1 values in ASEC files for 1985 (and 1995)
India Area-level data (geo2) inconsistent for total population, urban share, ...
Does anyone have a method for handling missing data in CPS "EDUC" variable? 2...
How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Variables from Full Year Consolidated Files currently not included in IPUMS-M...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |