Status:Closed    Asked:Mar 15, 2018 - 12:03 PM


Hi! I'm using the ASEC data from 1972 to 2017 where incwage has valid answers. In the middle of creating a sampling weight using ASECWT, I found that there are a number cases with ASECWT<=0. Specially, there are 162 with ASECWT=0 and 257 with ASECWT<0. These of course wouldn't work for generating a weight variable. Why are there these values, and how to deal with them for creating a sampling weight variables? Many thanks.

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer

The existence of these negative weights is mentioned in the ASECWT comparability statement. The negative weights are considered valid, and are designed to account for oversampling. However, since most stats packages can not accommodate them, and since the number of affected cases is small, some researchers simply chose to exclude those cases. Similarly, you may wish to also exclude those with a weight == 0.


Mar 19, 2018 - 08:13 AM

Report it


Thanks, Michelle, for the answer, a version of that (about exluding the negative weights) I also found from a search. So far I've excluded the negative weighted cases because I created my own proportional samplng weight using ASECWT but kept the 0 weight cases because the 0 weight cases wouldn't mess up the computation and just wouldn't contribute to the overall analysis.


Mar 19, 2018 - 10:30 AM

Report it


Does using the INCLUGH variable over time requires correcting for the VERIFY=...
Does CLASSWKR in ASEC regarding self-employment (code 10) include incorporate...
I am trying to cross age, urban, and race. Which weight am I supposed to use?
Regarding Top-Coded and Replacement Values for 1990 HHINCOME
What happened to the tobacco use questions? They seem to have disappeared.
Do you have a plan to release earlier Contingent worker supplement data (1995...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |