Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Jan 24, 2017 - 01:48 PM

Are there factors other than CITYERR to adjust for when aggregating by CITY in ACS?

I'm attempting to use BPL to get birth locations for citizens of large cities using the 2015 ACS figures. Am I correct that aggregating by CITY and BPL, then summing PERWT would get that number? Would there be any concerns other than dealing with CITYERR?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Jeff Bloem

Staff

It sounds like your procedure will provide your desired estimates. You probably already know that not all cities are identifiable by CITY in the 2015 ACS sample, but that could be another concern for you to consider. Additionally, depending on the size of the city, your estimates may have fairly large standard errors. This can be ameliorated by using ACS multi-year files. Other than these issues and dealing with CITYERR to impose a more restrictive error limit, there shouldn't be any additional concerns.

 

Jan 25, 2017 - 09:13 AM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

Will IPUMS eventually include the CPS Unbanked Supplement from 2015?
Besides the variable for limitations with IADL, are there any other variables...
CPS Volunteer Supplement 2002-2015 - Differences between vlstatus and vlhallo...
JTYEARAGO coding?
Info on non-primary occupation in CPS?
When did IPUMS-CPS start like the way (easily downloadable way) like now?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |