Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Jul 24, 2017 - 09:47 AM

Bins for incwage in the 1950 sample. How was the binning implemented? Rounded to the nearest bin value?

Bins for incwage in the 1950 sample. How was the binning implemented? Rounded to the nearest bin value? Or is the incwage integrated variable the midpoint of the bin and any value of the source variable that falls in the bin is given the midpoint of the bin?


Also, the source variable US1950A_EARN has value increments of $100 and starts with 0, then 100, 200, 300, etc.


The integrated variable incwage has value increments of $100 and starts with $50, then 150, 250, 350, etc.


How exactly was the source variable converted to the integrated variable?


 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Jeff Bloem

Staff

This is a bit confusing. The Comparability Tab may help clear some of this up. In the 1950 sample, INCWAGE values represent the midpoints of hundred dollar intervals. Therefore, for example, for the interval of 0-100 (coded as 100 in the source variable) the code is ==50 in the integrated variable.

I hope this helps.

 

Jul 24, 2017 - 12:37 PM

1
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

Reason for missing MIGSTA1 values in ASEC files for 1985 (and 1995)
India Area-level data (geo2) inconsistent for total population, urban share, ...
Does anyone have a method for handling missing data in CPS "EDUC" variable? 2...
How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Variables from Full Year Consolidated Files currently not included in IPUMS-M...
Wrong HH weight Tanzania 2012 census?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |