Question

Status:Open    Asked:Feb 09, 2016 - 04:57 AM

Brazil migration variables 1980 1991 2000

Hello,

I have detected some marked inconsistencies between the unharmonized variables

BR1980A_LENGHTMU

BR1980A_LENGHTST

BR1991A_NYRLIVST

BR1991A_NYRLIVMU

BR2000A_DURMUNI

BR2000A_DURSTATE

and their harmonized counterparts (eg. migratep).

Moreover, the universe description of the migration variables is not always adequate (eg. for migbr1 or BR1991A_NYRLIVST, people NIU are those that have always lived in their current municipality of residece, not those that still live in their state of birth).

As a last point, and here is my question : for BR2000A_DURMUNI, it is documented that 99 means "unknwon". What about BR2000A_DURSTATE, BR1991A_NYRLIVST and

BR1991A_NYRLIVMU ? Does 99 also mean "unknown" for these 3 variables ?

Thanks.

Geoffrey

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Answers

This question has not yet been answered.

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

How comparable across years are INCTOT’s income sources in Brazil?
In IHIS what does "not ascertained" mean for BIDIEV, PIPEV etc in 2000 and 20...
I need to calculate the " STATAXAC " variable (state taxes after deducting ta...
Chinese Census Data: data for unharmonized variable CN1990A_0421 in micro le...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |