Status:Closed    Asked:Jan 05, 2015 - 10:13 AM

Consistency of variable "lineno"

To whom this may concern--

I have been linking the responses of those who participated in both the Jan/Feb and March supplement in year x (specifically in 1995, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007). To do this, with the guidance of IPUMS staff member Tim Moreland, I merged the IPUMS CPS data with the NBER data to gain unique person identifiers, and believe to have done this successfully.

My remaining question, however, is in regards to the usefulness of the variable "lineno." I have been using lineno as one of the several variables to uniquely identify respondents and link them throughout months in year x. However, it got me thinking that even if a person participated in both Jan/Feb and March of year x, isn't it possible that they have a different "lineno" in Jan/Feb than they do in March of year x?

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide--


Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer




The line number variable (LINENO) records the order in which members of a household are listed by the interviewer. Typically, the head of household is listed first, followed by the spouse, their children, members of subfamilies and unrelated persons. The respondent's LINENO should then remain constant over time, barring a recording error.

In addition, it is possible to identify any LINENO changes by verifying that a respondent's age, race, and/or sex remain constant from month to month, with the exception of age being allowed to increase by one. These few mismatches can then either be dropped or an effort can be made to update a respondent's LINENO by utilizing demographic variables. Thus, for the small potential subset of respondent's whose line number does change, it should not cause an issue for your analysis.

See this paper for a more in-depth discussion on the accuracy of matching CPS respondents across time and potential errors.

Hope this helps.


Jan 06, 2015 - 10:28 AM

Report it


Merging Job Tenure Information with March Supplement Over Years
Q for Tim Moreland Re: Trouble merging NBER and IPUMS
Why are not all the "not in the labour force" categories filled for the EMPST...
Merging issues with the Sep 2000, Apr 2001, Jun 2001 and Feb 2002 basic month...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |