Status:Closed    Asked:Aug 07, 2018 - 01:24 PM

Does the variable EMPSTAT spesifically identify those not in labor force because of disability?


The Census Bureau has a set of seven questions/variables that they recommend using to identify adults who have a work disability. One of these questions is the CPS variable PEMLR. When PEMLR = 6, then an individual is not in labor force due to a disability. IMPUS has a similar variable, which I believe is EMPSTAT, but there are currently only three options for "not in labor force": 1) unable to work- 32, 2) retired-34, and 3) other-36.

Are individuals coded as not in labor force because they are unable to work (PEMLR = 32) ONLY individuals who are disabled or do they include other individuals as well?

Thank you.

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer


Jeff Bloem


In some years (after 1988) the Census Bureau's variable PEMLR==6 indicates "disabled" and in other years this code indicates "unable to work". In IPUMS CPS, we have harmonized EMPSTAT==32 to be "Not in Labor Force - unable to work". Therefore, if you are looking at data from more recent years, then EMPSTAT==32 indicates those who are explicitly "disabled".


Aug 08, 2018 - 11:06 AM

Report it


Why are not all the "not in the labour force" categories filled for the EMPST...
How do the original CPS variables map to EMPSTAT?
Labor force flows at the MSA level
empstat and occ1990 - Not in labor force, but still reporting an occupation?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |