Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Mar 02, 2015 - 08:39 AM

Error in 2010 Indonesian classwk variable

I am looking at this variable for only children 17 and under. I find it strange that for 2000 and 2005 only 7-8% of children are working but in 2010 over 50% of them are working, and what's more, 96% of them are working in self-employment w/ temporary workers. I find that hard to beleive.


I read the questionnaire and can't really pinpoint any discrepancies between the three years in how the employment questions were asked. Is it a possible survey error?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Tim_Moreland

Staff

Based on the questionnaire, the 2010 Indonesia CLASSWK variable has a slight change in Universe. In 2000 and 2005, only those persons working in the previous week were asked the CLASSWK question. In 2010, those on "temporary leave" in the previous week were also asked the CLASSWK question. As a result, the 2010 version includes unemployed persons and is not comparable to earlier versions. However, recoding those persons in 2010 with an EMPSTAT value not equal to "1:Employed" as CLASSWK="0:NIU" will make CLASSWK consistent with 2000 and 2005 both in terms of the Universe and the percentage of sample children working (approx. 4%).


Hope this helps.

 

Mar 03, 2015 - 12:21 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

zero wages
Sample weights
tehre is information about the size of the firm in the Census/ASEC datasets?
Sample selection for a study of a subgroup over time?
Is it possible to get information on municipality or district of respondent i...
Weekly earnings and usual hours
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |