Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Feb 03, 2016 - 09:06 AM

For OCC2010, is there any danger is aggregating the data to 2-digit groups within the 27 broader categories

I'd like to group the OCC2010 variable into roughly 90 categories based on the first 2 digits for each code. For instance, within computer and matehmatical I'd like to split up the 10s, the 11s, and the 12s into 3 groups. The 400+ categories makes the bundles a bit small for my analysis, but 27 is too few. But I'm really curious if I'm missusing the data if I do that

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Tim_Moreland

Staff

The 27 category scheme we provide is a commonly-used method for organizing OCC2010; however, users can certainly choose to group the occupations differently. There is no inherent danger to using the first two digits of OCC2010 and aggregating the data into a greater number of categories.


Hope this helps.

 

Feb 09, 2016 - 01:56 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

When did IPUMS-CPS start like the way (easily downloadable way) like now?
Replicate weights for use with CPS-TUS
Longitudinal cohort in TUS 2014/2015?
When can we expect NFHS 4 data to included in IPUMS-DHS database?
trying again need more characters
DOINGLW2 variable
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |