Status:Closed    Asked:Feb 03, 2016 - 09:06 AM

For OCC2010, is there any danger is aggregating the data to 2-digit groups within the 27 broader categories

I'd like to group the OCC2010 variable into roughly 90 categories based on the first 2 digits for each code. For instance, within computer and matehmatical I'd like to split up the 10s, the 11s, and the 12s into 3 groups. The 400+ categories makes the bundles a bit small for my analysis, but 27 is too few. But I'm really curious if I'm missusing the data if I do that

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer




The 27 category scheme we provide is a commonly-used method for organizing OCC2010; however, users can certainly choose to group the occupations differently. There is no inherent danger to using the first two digits of OCC2010 and aggregating the data into a greater number of categories.

Hope this helps.


Feb 09, 2016 - 01:56 PM

Report it


Puma Adjustments--Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana
How to link a hierarchical extract with a rectangular extract in ATUS X? CASE...
What is the codeframe for RECTYPE? The codebook says it's 1-digit alpha but a...
Relationship between Counties and 2010 PUMAs
Article about 1790-1840 household censuses published yet?
Labor force flows at the MSA level
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |