Status:Closed    Asked:Jul 08, 2015 - 12:37 PM

How can I generate MSA-level data with consistent MSA boundaries in 1990, 2000, and 2008-12?

METAREA changes as the definitions change. I am using 2003 OMB MSA definitions to analyze data from 1990 and 2000 Census and 2008-12 ACS, and I have a county-metro crosswalk for 2003. County-level data is not fully available via IPUMS. I thought of creating a PUMA-MSA crosswalk for 2003, backing PUMAs into counties, but some PUMAs cross metro boundaries.

How can I get metro-level data with consistent MSA boundaries?

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer




Unfortunately, there is not a method that will completely account for changes in the geographic definitions. We leave the ultimate decision of how to account for these inconsistencies to the researcher. Some researchers choose to ignore the changing definitions; others attempt to piece together the consistent components of METAREA as best as possible; and, others develop a unique method.

Regardless of what you choose, I do recommend comparing your final MSA-level data to published Census tables for the purpose of determining whether or not your results for a metro area will be biased by the changes. The NHGIS project, which is also housed in the Minnesota Population Center, offers many of the official Census tables going back to 1790 at several geographic levels, including metro area. While NHGIS is primarily focused on mapping data, the summary tables can be extracted independent of shape files as .csv files with optional descriptive headers. Additionally, the Census' American FactFinder site is another source for Census tables.

Hope this helps.


Jul 08, 2015 - 04:06 PM

Report it


MSA equivalency to 2000 PUMAs
Is IPUMS ACS data representative at the MSA level?
1990 1% PUMA boundaries file when using 1990 1% unweighted IPUMS USA data?
I need to calculate a consistent metro definition between the 1990 Census & 2...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |