Status:Closed    Asked:Jul 09, 2017 - 01:28 PM

How reliable is data for slaves enumerated in the 1830 complete sample?

Under Known Issues, it reads "Use with Caution." What does this mean? I found some unusual observations -- which may be coding errors. Because the names of the household heads have been removed the record, I can't compare the record with the original manuscript census.

So, how confident should I be with these data?

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer


Jeff Bloem


Here is a link to a page listing some of the known errors with the 1790-1840 datasets. In particular relation to the enumeration of slaves it looks like the counts are not consistent with other published figures and are thus not representative at the national level.


Jul 11, 2017 - 01:58 PM

Report it


I am looking for the Kessler 6 variable in IPUMS-MEPS
Reason for missing MIGSTA1 values in ASEC files for 1985 (and 1995)
India Area-level data (geo2) inconsistent for total population, urban share, ...
Does anyone have a method for handling missing data in CPS "EDUC" variable? 2...
How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Variables from Full Year Consolidated Files currently not included in IPUMS-M...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |