Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Aug 10, 2018 - 04:35 PM

I need to calculate a consistent metro definition between the 1990 Census & 2016 ACS. Any ideas for a crosswalk?

We frequently use the missouri data center MABLE/Geocorr to get PUMA to Metro crosswalks, but I see that their 1990 crosswalk tool does not correspond to anything in a later geography. This leaves me wondering how I can get from 1990 PUMAs to some metro definition that could be consistent with 2016 metros (as crosswalked from 2010 PUMAs using MABLE/Geocorr). Would be grateful for any insights / advice!

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

First, you can get a crosswalk from 1990 PUMAs to other 1990 geographic units through the IPUMS USA 1990 PUMA Definitions page. (Note that the table on that page lists crosswalks by state, but there are also nationwide crosswalks available through the links just above the table.)


Second, you can get delineation files for current (2017, 2015 or 2013) definitions of metro areas (i.e., core-based statistical areas or "CBSAs") through this Census Bureau page.


In _most_ cases, the 1990 counties in the 1990 PUMA equivalency files correspond directly to the current counties in the CBSA delineation files, so it should generally be possible to bridge directly from the 1990 PUMA crosswalk through the CBSA delineation files to create a 1990-PUMA-to-current-metro-area crosswalk.


Another Census page lists Substantial Changes to Counties since 1970. A couple changes that I know would have an impact on the 1990-PUMA-to-current-CBSA crosswalk are: the creation of Broomfield County, Colorado in 2001 (which splits off parts of the Boulder and Greeley metro areas into the Denver area), and the change of the name of Dade County, Florida, to Miami-Dade County in 1997, which also involves a county FIPS code change from 025 to 086. There may be other relevant changes, and unfortunately, I don't have a simple answer for how to deal with them--especially cases that involve county boundary changes, as with Broomfield. There are some fairly simple approaches, but the simplest options are not necessarily accurate.


Note also that the Census Bureau's 2016 ACS summary files (as provided by IPUMS NHGIS) use 2015 CBSA definitions, but if you're obtaining any microdata from IPUMS USA, you might prefer to use 2013 CBSA definitions, as used by the MET2013 variable in IPUMS USA. (We do not have an equivalent "MET2015" variable.) As you may know, MET2013 supplies 2013 metro area codes, where possible, back through the 2000 microdata samples. We have plans to extend MET2013 back through 1990 and possibly 1980, but unfortunately for your application, it may be a year or two before we get to that!


Feel free to respond with more questions if you have any.

 

Aug 13, 2018 - 12:16 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

Crosswalk between 1990 migpuma and county (or puma)
How can I generate MSA-level data with consistent MSA boundaries in 1990, 200...
Is it possible to aggregate PUMAs to the metro area?
1990 1% PUMA boundaries file when using 1990 1% unweighted IPUMS USA data?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |