Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Oct 08, 2013 - 07:20 PM

I'm confused about the meaning of one value, 0, in WKSUNEM1 in IPUMS-CPS.

WKSUNEM1 has two values that imply the respondent was working (not unemployed) in the preceding year: 0 (0 weeks without a job) and 99 (NIU - "Not in Universe"). When I filter for members of the California civilian labor force and exclude the NIU values, I wind up with a total of 4.2 million workers, far short of the 18.9 million known total. Virtually all of the difference seems to be explained by the NIU.

That would be fine except for one thing: the 2.2 million workers in the [WKSUNEM = 0] category. These folks, at least in theory, spent 0 weeks unemployed in the prior year. I'm sure there's something, probably something obvious, that I'm missing. Ordinarily I'd call the Bureau of Labor Statistics and ask them to explain, but ...

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

I'm not sure I completely understand your concern, but I can explain what the zero represents. A person coded as zero worked at least 1 and no more than 51 weeks during the preceding year, but was not unemployed at any time. Thus, these cases would be persons who were either employed or not in the labor force at all times during the year.

 

Oct 09, 2013 - 10:53 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

Is the proverty threshold inclusive or exclusive
Follow up to: Does IPUMS create data requested by a user?
Is the poverty threshold inclusive or exclusive?
How do you construct a 2000 migpuma1 and 2010 migpuma1 crosswalk?
Does IPUMS create data requested by a user?
Trivial question: Is it eye-PUMS or ih-PUMS?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |