Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Oct 08, 2013 - 07:20 PM

I'm confused about the meaning of one value, 0, in WKSUNEM1 in IPUMS-CPS.

WKSUNEM1 has two values that imply the respondent was working (not unemployed) in the preceding year: 0 (0 weeks without a job) and 99 (NIU - "Not in Universe"). When I filter for members of the California civilian labor force and exclude the NIU values, I wind up with a total of 4.2 million workers, far short of the 18.9 million known total. Virtually all of the difference seems to be explained by the NIU.

That would be fine except for one thing: the 2.2 million workers in the [WKSUNEM = 0] category. These folks, at least in theory, spent 0 weeks unemployed in the prior year. I'm sure there's something, probably something obvious, that I'm missing. Ordinarily I'd call the Bureau of Labor Statistics and ask them to explain, but ...

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

I'm not sure I completely understand your concern, but I can explain what the zero represents. A person coded as zero worked at least 1 and no more than 51 weeks during the preceding year, but was not unemployed at any time. Thus, these cases would be persons who were either employed or not in the labor force at all times during the year.

 

Oct 09, 2013 - 10:53 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

I am looking for the Kessler 6 variable in IPUMS-MEPS
Reason for missing MIGSTA1 values in ASEC files for 1985 (and 1995)
India Area-level data (geo2) inconsistent for total population, urban share, ...
Does anyone have a method for handling missing data in CPS "EDUC" variable? 2...
How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Variables from Full Year Consolidated Files currently not included in IPUMS-M...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |