Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Jul 27, 2017 - 10:54 PM

INCTOT for 1950

Hi,


According to the Comparability Tab under INCTOT (Total personal income), it is indicated that INCTOT (total personal income) is the sum of INCWAGE (wage and salary income), INCBUSFM (business and farm income), and INCOTHER (other income). (https://usa.ipums.org/usa-action/vari...) However, as you can see:


On the fourth line, INCTOT = 350, INCWAGE = 0, INCBUSFM = 250, and INCOTHER = 150, which doesn't make sense as 350 ≠ 250 + 150.


There were several similar cases, which caused issues when I was calculating ratios such as (INCWAGE/INCTOT, INCBUSFM/INCTOT, INCOTHER/INCTOT), and the ratios exceeded 1 (or 100%).


Is this just the technical issue? Or am I understanding something wrong?


Thanks for your help.

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Jeff Bloem

Staff


This is largely a technical issue. The codes for INCWAGE, INCBUSFM, and INCOTHER all represent midpoints of hundred-dollar intervals. So, do the codes for INCTOT. The discrepancies you note, are consequences of this fact. The questionnaire in 1950 asked for a specific number, the intervaled codes were added later by the Census Bureau. So, although the true sum of INCWAGE, INCBUSFM, and INCOTHER equals what is then intervaled and represented by a midpoint via INCTOT, summing these variables as they are presented in the public use data won't always replicate the true sum.

I hope this helps.

 

Jul 28, 2017 - 10:46 AM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

about INCTOT (total personal income)
INCTOT, INCWAGE, INCBUSFM, INCOTHER
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |