Status:Closed    Asked:Apr 16, 2014 - 10:38 AM

In 1960 US Census, how is it possible that incwage=0 when wkswork2>3 (worked over 40 weeks)

Im using the 1960 US Census, and I'm restricting my sample to those who worked over 40 weeks the previous year (wkswork2>3), but it seems like over 10% of the sample has wage and salary income (incwage) of zero. How is this possible?

Thanks for the help!

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer




My first inclination is that most of those people working more than 40 hours but making $0 in wages or salary are actually self-employed and thereby may not make there income as a salary or wage. Another large percentage of that group may be Unpaid Family Workers. You can identify both Self-Employed persons and Unpaid Family Workers with the detailed version of the variable CLASSWKR (classwkrd). Some other issues may be that people work on commission and either do not consider this a wage or salary or did not have a very productive year. There is no variable for identifying commission workers, but you can make a guess based on their Occupation, using the variable OCC1990. Along with salespeople, there seems to be clusters of Members of the Clergy and Farm Workers reporting $0 INCWAGE. These numbers are small, and you can think of easy ways to explain why they had $0 income but reported working. Also, it is important to recognize that these data are dependent upon actual responses, and there can be errors in reporting.

I hope this helps.


Apr 17, 2014 - 09:26 AM

Report it


Wrong HH weight Tanzania 2012 census?
Assign Individuals to PUMAS, append dataset
Regarding: Does CLASSWKR in ASEC before 1988 include incorporated and non-inc...
Does using the INCLUGH variable over time requires correcting for the VERIFY=...
Does CLASSWKR in ASEC regarding self-employment (code 10) include incorporate...
I am trying to cross age, urban, and race. Which weight am I supposed to use?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |