Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Apr 17, 2017 - 11:02 PM

In the AHTUS, why does the xtimewt weight have values of -999998 for cases in which recwght is not missing?

These cases come from various states--including NY. So why do they receive a value of -999998 for the xtimewt? For these cases, should I use the recwght value instead?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Jeff Bloem

Staff

These negative values are errors. They should be "0s" for the purposes of comparability. For more on this see the variable description for XTIMEWT. This error has been fixed and should be reflected after the next data release.

 

Apr 19, 2017 - 08:25 AM

1
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

More recent climate data?
JTYEARAGO coding?
Info on non-primary occupation in CPS?
When did IPUMS-CPS start like the way (easily downloadable way) like now?
Replicate weights for use with CPS-TUS
Longitudinal cohort in TUS 2014/2015?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |