Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Feb 22, 2016 - 04:54 AM

Is "migcounty" in 1940 100% census only available for a for few states, i.e. Alaska, Hawaii and Wyoming?

When I import the 1940 100% census data to Stata, I find that there are non-zero observations for the variable migcounty only for those individuals whose 1940 state of residence is Alaska, Hawaii or Wyoming. The total amount of non-zero observations is less than 0.5% of the population. Is this a problem in how I am reading the IPUMS-generated data file, or are there no data for individuals residing in other states?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Tim_Moreland

Staff

You have found an error in the 1940 dataset that we did not know about. Thanks for pointing this out! We plan to release a corrected version of the MIGCOUNTY variable in the next couple months. In the meantime, since you identified a significant data error you are now entitled to a shiny, new IPUMS Mug! Please email your address to ipums@umn.edu so that we can send you your prize.


Thank you for helping us maintain these important data resources!

 

Feb 23, 2016 - 01:12 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

The highest one percent incwage earners are combined into the incwage"Top Cod...
To compute unemployment rates from Ipums-I, should I use perwt as pweights or...
Why is the income wage variable incwage-capped? and how is the cap determined...
USA IPUMS 1980 ancestry variable -- mapping to country names
Did the version of database change since 2011?
Are DATANUM, SERIAL, and PERNUM the same in single-year and 5-year ACS sample...
Login   |   Register


Share |