Status:Closed    Asked:Jun 03, 2017 - 03:30 PM

Observations Do not Match Up NBER ASEC and IPUMS CPS ASEC for 2001 and 2014?

In theory, you should be able to merge the NBER March supplement and the IPUMS CPS supplement for every year. Moreover, I can merge them perfectly from 1988 to 2016 for all years except for 2001 and 2014.

I think it has something to do with special sampling in those two years in particular. In 2001, the CPS also had SCHIP supplement questions and in 2014 the CPS did an odd sampling in order to incorporate new income questions. Can someone confirm that these are the reasons the number of observations differ? If not, can someone explain why this only occures in these two years?

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer




Your assumptions are correct. The 2001 ASEC file available through the IPUMS CPS extract system includes the SCHIP expansion (the NBER CPS Supplements page has the SCHIP file as a separate link for March 2001) and the 2014 ASEC file includes both the 5/8ths and 3/8ths samples while NBER offers them separately (labelled "traditional" and "redesign"), so these case count differences are expected.

I hope this helps.


Jun 06, 2017 - 10:14 AM

Report it


Thank you very much for your help on this, and my other questions as well. I really appreciate you taking the time to look into these very specific questions for me! It has really helped me a lot with the research I am doing! Thanks again.


Jun 06, 2017 - 10:44 AM

Report it


Why are there differences in the number of observations between IPUMS CPS and...
What is variable to identify IPUMS CPS Basic March cases from supplement case...
Merging issues with the Sep 2000, Apr 2001, Jun 2001 and Feb 2002 basic month...
Why does the CPS December 2015 Food Supplement Survey not merge with the Marc...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |