Status:Closed    Asked:Nov 09, 2018 - 01:04 PM

Rep weights and full samples

I understand you are supposed to have the full sample downloaded to use rep weights. If I'm using household rep weights (ACS 2012-16), do I need to keep all person level observations? Does full sample include group quarters?

Secondly, is it impossible to test models on a random subsample and still use survey weights properly? I'm having issues with the amount of time Stata is taking to run these models and didn't know if there was a way to speed up the process.

Thank you!

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Voted Best Answer

An accessible explanation of what's doable and not doable and likely erroneously doable with subsamples is

If you rely on replicate weights, I would argue you don't have to use the full sample.

Full sample does include the group quarter observations; you can use RELATE variable or GQTYPE to identify them.

As a preliminary step, I would analyze my models with the main weight only [perwt] as far as I can recall off the top of my head what the variable name is, and expect that my standard errors could be off by a factor of at most 2. Then once I have models that I am satisfied with, I would move on to the full analysis. To make it easier in Stata, you can have

* fake settings: uncomment for prelim analysis

* svyset [pw=perwt]

* real settings: uncomment for the ultimate analysis

* svyset [pw=perwt], vce(sdr) sdrw(perwtp1-perwtp80) mse

svy : model whatever

Then when the time comes, you can run it with the real thing.



Nov 09, 2018 - 04:29 PM

Report it


IPUMS USA Person Weights Discrepancies Over Time
Sample or Person Weights, and NIU Issues
Discrepancy Between 1% Sample and Full Count Data
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |