Status:Closed    Asked:Dec 31, 2015 - 12:00 PM

The 1850 & 1860 US Samples

An 1850 US sample I extraced shows n= 1,901 for white males in Mississippi & an 1860 sample I extracted shows n=3,574 for white males in Mississippi. Both data sets are listed by MPC as 1% samples of the free population. Given this, it appears odd to me that the 1860 sample is nearly twice as large as the 1859 sample (a ratio of 1.88), especially since the 1850 Census Report shows 156,287 white males in MS and the 1860 Census Report shows 186,273 white males in M, which yields a ratio of only 1.19. This census count ratio is far below the 1.88 formed from the two 1850 and 1860 MPC samples for the same population. Any ideas on what is going on? Thanks.

David Swanson

UC Riverside

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer




I am unable to replicate the 1850 sample size that you report. There are only 1,513 white males in the 1850 Mississippi sample. For the 1860 sample, your n=3,574 figure appears to be the entire 1860 Mississippi sample, including females and non-white persons. When restricted to white males, I get 1,860 respondents, which is only slightly higher than the 1850 sample size.

Hope this helps.


Jan 05, 2016 - 03:12 PM

Report it


Thanks. I must have inadvertantly included them when I extracted the file. I though all was ok and I checked it to make sure it was what I wanted, but so it goes.


Jan 05, 2016 - 03:25 PM

Report it


How Do I Link Husbands & Wives in 1974 & 2008 Liberian IPUMS Samples to Study...
I am looking for the Kessler 6 variable in IPUMS-MEPS
Reason for missing MIGSTA1 values in ASEC files for 1985 (and 1995)
India Area-level data (geo2) inconsistent for total population, urban share, ...
Does anyone have a method for handling missing data in CPS "EDUC" variable? 2...
How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |