Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Oct 26, 2017 - 11:59 PM

USC 2010 10 percent has no one over age 95

Dear IPUMS,

I was using the 2010 Census 10 percent extract and noticed that the maximum age in this dataset is 95. I thought it was a bit odd that zero 95+ year olds (0.1 percent of the population) would enter a 10 percent random sample. On the variable description for AGE, there is no availability for ages over 96 in USC 2010. I'm not sure what that means.

It would be great if I could confirm whether the age values are actual ages and that random sampling lead to no 95+ year olds in your 10 percent data.

Best, Shiro Kuriwaki

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Jeff Bloem

Staff

This is a good question. The Census Bureau actually topcodes AGE values by state. Appendix E of this document shows how the topcode is defined for each state. So, for individuals who have an age at or above the state-specific topcode their age is replaced by the average of the top-coded values within their state. This procedure is done in order to maintain confidentiality of individuals included in the census.

 

Oct 27, 2017 - 12:33 PM

1
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Just a note that the release schedule for IPUMS USA and FAQ funding are out o...
Variables from Full Year Consolidated Files currently not included in IPUMS-M...
Wrong HH weight Tanzania 2012 census?
Assign Individuals to PUMAS, append dataset
Regarding: Does CLASSWKR in ASEC before 1988 include incorporated and non-inc...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |