Status:Closed    Asked:Mar 09, 2017 - 11:27 PM

Unreliable DWELLING and DWSEQ in 1920 complete data?

I'm trying to calculate average number of households per dwelling by enumeration district, using the complete 1920 dataset. My plan was to use DWELLING and DWSEQ... but most dwellings in the data seem to have DWSEQ values up to 99. (The average DWSEQ max for New York City is 99.95. I've sampled data from a few rural regions and found similar numbers.)

An average of 99 households per dwelling strikes me as fairly unrealistic even in urban settings, especially since the 1900 5% sample gives much lower values for the same areas (for NYC, average DWSEQ max is ~7).

Any chance that DWELLING and DWSEQ haven't been cleaned in the preliminary release of the 1920 complete dataset? Or am I missing/misreading something?


Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer


Jeff Bloem


Sorry for the delay responding to this question. It is what you expect, these variables are are not complete for the full-count file. We will be hiding this variable on the external site, until the variables have been completed, so to avoid future confusion. Again, sorry for the inconvenience.


Mar 24, 2017 - 08:24 AM

Report it


CPS Volunteer Supplement 2002-2015 - Differences between vlstatus and vlhallo...
Info on non-primary occupation in CPS?
When did IPUMS-CPS start like the way (easily downloadable way) like now?
Replicate weights for use with CPS-TUS
Longitudinal cohort in TUS 2014/2015?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |