Question

Status:Closed    Asked:May 11, 2016 - 07:40 PM

Using IPUMS-CPS, I noticed that there are counties that are large enough that are not identified in the sample.

For instance, Hennepin County in the state of Minnesota is not identified starting in 2004. Is there a reasong for it?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Tim_Moreland

Staff

Due to confidentiality restrictions, the Census Bureau must suppress any geographic identifiers that pose a risk of uniquely identifying individual respondents. In addition, a county can only be identified if it is equivalent to a single primary sampling unit (PSU). Smaller counties will oftentimes be appended to a larger county when forming PSUs. It is possible that Hennepin County's PSU was combined with smaller counties beginning in 2004, which would explain why it was no longer identifiable in the CPS data. Unfortunately, I am not able to find confirmation of the reason for Hennepin County's suppression. I recommend that you contact the Census Bureau directly for further information.


Sorry that I could not deliver better news.

 

May 24, 2016 - 02:56 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

How is an IPUMS-CPS record uniquely identified?
Referring to your answer about merging IPUMS to raw March 2011 CPS data - pro...
"Region, Division, State, and PUMAs are the only geographic areas identified ...
Will there be some people in one county be identified at county level while o...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |