Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Nov 02, 2015 - 11:13 AM

Using Strata and Cluster variables to obtain confidence intervals vs. using replicate weights

Can you use the Strata and Cluster variables, paired with linearization, to obtain confidence intervals around estimates in the 2013 ACS?




Are there any disadvantages to doing that, as opposed to estimating confidence intervals with the replicate weights? I notice that there's some description of this on this page (https://usa.ipums.org/usa/complex_sur...)


which gives commands like this:


 svyset cluster [pweight=perwt], /// 

 strata(strata) svy, subpop(if age >= 65): mean var1 

 

I checked out this document 

(https://usa.ipums.org/usa/resources/c...) 

But I wasn't sure if the same findings 

(about linearization vs. replication methods) applied to the 2013 ACS.

 

Many thanks.

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Erin_Meyer

Staff

Yes, you can use the Strata and Cluster variables to obtain confidence intervals for the 2013 ACS. This paper offers some insight into different methods of calculating standard error with IPUMS data products and how the outcomes may vary. Replicate weights are said to provide more robust results, but they also require more computing time. Regardless, the confidence intervals calculated through linearization or the use of replicate weights should be comparable. In the end it is up to the researcher to decide which they feel more comfortable using.


I hope this helps.

 

Nov 04, 2015 - 03:44 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

Missing Standard Error for 5% 2000 estimates using Cluster/Strata
Why are not all the "not in the labour force" categories filled for the EMPST...
Login   |   Register


Share |