Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Nov 28, 2017 - 11:54 AM

Vast Overestimation of Population

I am analyzing the specific household and individual characteristics of a limited number of counties in New Jersey. I downloaded the 2016 household and individual variables I wanted and tried to check my population counts to verify everything. However, when I apply the HHWT or PERWT to the PUMA counts I get a population of 8.9 million. According to the FactFinder the population should be closer to 3.1 million. I double checked my PUMAs and made sure the sample was limited to the geography in question, but it still seems way too big.


What am I doing wrong?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Jeff Bloem

Staff

I just looked into your most recent data extract and I've noticed that you haven't included a state identifier variable (STATEFIP). This is important because PUMA codes are state-dependent and must be read in combination with one of the state identifier variables. I suspect this is the main source of the descrepency. If you continue to not find population counts that are close to American Fact Finder, send me your code and I can take a closer look.

 

Nov 28, 2017 - 12:38 PM

1
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

when trying to declare the IPUMS data as panel on stata there are repeated ti...
2010 5-year PUMA definition
Where can I find city populations, by age, San Diego, New Orleans, Atlanta, C...
Hi, it has been over 4 hours for my data extract and I was wondering if there...
When I take several Nov Supplements, the weighted number of voters equals pub...
Are there aggregate categories for OCC/OCCLY in CPS?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |