Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Aug 13, 2014 - 08:58 AM

When using "spmwt" to estimate family level estimates, should sample be restricted to pernum = 1?

I am doing an income analysis of families with children using the supplemental poverty measure. All of my income measures are constant across families. I am using the "spmwt", but worry that I should restrict my sample so that each family should only be observed once, e.g., where pernum = 1 (though the value of pernum could easily be 2, or 3, as the values of income do not vary by pernum within family).


If I do not restrict the sample, am I not overrepresenting large families?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Joe_Grover

Staff

You are correct that if you do not restrict the sample to a single person per family your estimates will overrepresent large families. However, simply restricting the sample to PERNUM==1 selects one person per HOUSEHOLD rather than one person per FAMILY. Furthermore, the SPM definition of family is different than the official "family unit" definition (see SPMNEWFAM). The SPMWTs were calculated for SPM family units (SPMFAMUNIT) so you to generate representative estimates you would need to select only one person per SPMFAMUNIT ID.

I hope this helps.

 

Aug 13, 2014 - 11:10 AM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

Wrong HH weight Tanzania 2012 census?
Assign Individuals to PUMAS, append dataset
Regarding: Does CLASSWKR in ASEC before 1988 include incorporated and non-inc...
Does using the INCLUGH variable over time requires correcting for the VERIFY=...
Does CLASSWKR in ASEC regarding self-employment (code 10) include incorporate...
I am trying to cross age, urban, and race. Which weight am I supposed to use?
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |