Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Jun 05, 2017 - 12:08 PM

Why EMPSAME is NIU in the monthly CPS MARCH-1994?

Why EMPSAME is NIU in the monthly CPS MARCH-1994?


Also, there are many observations NIU in other years/months, while they clearly should be in the universe of the variable (I am considering empstat to measure employment):


[All]: Employed persons not in month-in-sample 1 or 5, and were employed last month.


This pattern is increasing over time. Does anyone know why?



 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Joe_Grover

Staff

Congratulations! You have found a data error in IPUMS CPS! The IPUMS CPS team has identified the source of this error and is now working on a fix which should go out with the next data release (expected this summer). In the meantime, as is standard IPUMS policy, since you have identified a significant data error you are now entitled to a shiny new mug! Please email ipums@umn.edu with a shipping address so we can mail you your coveted prize!

Thank you for helping us maintain these important data resources.

 

Jun 07, 2017 - 02:54 PM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

Potential effects of sample size expansion in CPS: March 2000 to March 2001
In ATUS-X, why are there NIU cases for the var HHTENURE (the universe is CPS ...
Will both the extensive March CPS data for 2015, and the 2014 monthly data be...
Major sample attrition during 1994 and 1995 basic monthly CPS files
Why are not all the "not in the labour force" categories filled for the EMPST...
Login   |   Register


Share |