Question

Status:Closed    Asked:Sep 18, 2017 - 03:37 PM

Why is there an increase in the proportion of individuals married in 1989?

I calculated the weighted proportion of individuals who were married (with both spouse absent and spouse present) for each month in the sample and restricted the sample to non-farmer private workers ages 20-60. Plotting a line chart of the time series revealed that there was a 3% increase in the amount of married individuals from December 1988 to January 1989. Was there a major change in the way that marital status data was collected in 1989 that could result in this type of increase?

 
Do you have the same question? Follow this Question
 

Staff Answer

avatar

Jeff Bloem

Staff

I've been able to replicate the exact opposite of your observation. I'm not certain how you are specifying "non-farmer private workers", but I've found a 3% decrease in married individuals between December 1988 and January 1989. This observation seems to be caused by the inclusion of the response category "separated", which was introduced in January 1989. This seems to reduce the number of people reporting "married, spouse absent", who instead report "separated".

I hope this helps. Let us know if you have any additional questions.

 

Sep 19, 2017 - 10:03 AM

0
0
Report it

OTHER QUESTIONS NEEDING ANSWERS

NHGIS: How do I match FIPS Place codes to 1970/1980 Census Place Codes?
distinction between 2000 MIGPUMA1/PWPUMA00 codes and 2010 MIGPUMA1/PWPUMA00
Issues with January 2016 CPS Job Tenure Supplement
Hi! I am looking to do an analysis of food security trends by livelihood zone...
How can I match between June 1995 and September 1995?
YRIMMIG weighting
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |