Status:Closed    Asked:Nov 10, 2016 - 04:58 AM

number of region to region movers calculated using IPUMS ACS 2015 doesnot match to FactFinder table

Hi all,

I recently started using IPUMS ACS to calculate internal migration. I calculated 1 year region to region migration for population aged 1+, excluding within region migration. When I compare my results to the MOVERS BETWEEN REGIONS (2015 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates) table from FactFinder, I see that they are close to each other but not exactly the same. For example, acording to my calculations 96,654 people moved from Midwest to North East while FactFinder reports 91,687 movers.

Any idea why there is about 5,000 people difference?

I first thought the IPUMS ACS sample may not be the whole sample but it lists more than 3.1 million observations.



Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer


Jeff Bloem


It is typically not expected to exactly replicate official statistics published on Fact Finder. One reason for this is the margin for error of both user created estimates and the estimates published on Fact Finder. In fact, for the comparison you note here, your estimate is within the Fact Finder's reported margin of error - which is roughly +/- 7,903.


Nov 10, 2016 - 10:24 AM

Report it


I am looking for the Kessler 6 variable in IPUMS-MEPS
Reason for missing MIGSTA1 values in ASEC files for 1985 (and 1995)
India Area-level data (geo2) inconsistent for total population, urban share, ...
Does anyone have a method for handling missing data in CPS "EDUC" variable? 2...
How do I find the data file:Ipumsi_00001.dat for the 1974
Variables from Full Year Consolidated Files currently not included in IPUMS-M...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |