Status:Closed    Asked:Mar 23, 2015 - 03:31 PM

percent of respondents with margtax=0 spikes in 2004

I calculated the percent of (weighted) respondents with margtax=0 for various age categories, from the March CPS, 1992-2014. There is a significant spike in this percent in 2004. Any idea why this is in the data?

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer




Prior to the 2004 ASEC, the Census Bureau randomly assigned mean amounts for certain tax variables (see below), based on IRS aggregate tables. In 2004 and 2005, these tax variables were instead imputed by matching to the IRS data of similar households. Due to a three-year lag between the ASEC and the most recent IRS file, the Census Bureau had to make adjustments that they have acknowledged (p. 2) were "erratic in range, distribution, and aggregate amounts" and especially problematic for 2004. Indeed, the Census Bureau changed methods again in 2006.

However, I unfortunately cannot confirm the new tax model in 2004 is responsible for the spike in zero marginal tax respondents. You might consider contacting the Census Bureau directly for additional information on this issue.

Here is a list of imputed tax variables for 2004/2005:

Capital gains

Capital losses

IRA contributions

Self-employed health insurance deduction

Self-employed savings deduction (SEP, SIMPLE and qualified plans)

Itemized deductions

Child and dependent care expenses


Apr 09, 2015 - 01:11 PM

Report it


Where can I find city populations, by age, San Diego, New Orleans, Atlanta, C...
Hi, it has been over 4 hours for my data extract and I was wondering if there...
When I take several Nov Supplements, the weighted number of voters equals pub...
Are there aggregate categories for OCC/OCCLY in CPS?
Do you have any idea when STEPMOM and STEPDAD will be available for usage? Th...
Comparing 2015 ASEC CPS IPUMS with Census data and Table Creator, I note diff...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |