Status:Closed    Asked:Apr 13, 2018 - 02:33 PM

replicating BLS union data for California.

Using Earnwt and excluding self employment and only those that get wage and salary. In the year 2017 there are 2,028,420 workers that are members of a labor union (15.4%) of the working population. However on BLS site they have 2,491,000 (15.5%) of the working population. Am I doing something wrong?

Do you have the same question? Follow this Question

Staff Answer


Jeff Bloem


You have not done anything wrong. In general we do not expect to exactly replicate official published statistics with public use microdata. This is largely due to confidentiality requirements and other restrictions placed on public use data compared to restricted use data. We do, however, expect to be within some margin of error of published statistics and this certainly seems to be the case with this comparison.


Apr 13, 2018 - 04:34 PM

Report it


Does using the INCLUGH variable over time requires correcting for the VERIFY=...
Does CLASSWKR in ASEC regarding self-employment (code 10) include incorporate...
I am trying to cross age, urban, and race. Which weight am I supposed to use?
Regarding Top-Coded and Replacement Values for 1990 HHINCOME
What happened to the tobacco use questions? They seem to have disappeared.
Do you have a plan to release earlier Contingent worker supplement data (1995...
Login   |   Register

Recently Active Members

View More »

Share |